Everglades restoration cleared another hurdle Tuesday when the chief of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers signed off on chronically stalled work needed to move water south through the central wetlands and Florida Bay.

The move puts back on track projects that environmentalists had hoped to finalize earlier this year. Despite letters from lawmakers, including Gov. Rick Scott and the U.S. Secretary of the Interior, the Corps balked at approving the work in April, preventing it from being included in a major waterworks bill that typically languishes among bipartisan bickering.

In September, Florida lawmakers mounted a rare united effort to push through bipartisan legislation authorizing $1.9 billion in projects.

“No longer will bureaucratic red tape and finger pointing stand in the way of what we all know needs to get done – sending clean water south,” said U.S. Rep. Patrick Murphy, D-Jupiter, who helped steer the law.

Related

The suite of projects, called the Central Everglades Planning Project (CEPP), was pulled from a larger Everglades restoration plan in an attempt to speed up work that has dragged on for more than a decade. The report will now go to the Secretary of the Army and the Office of Management and Budget, but is not expected to face opposition.

Watch Out for That Puddle, Soon It Could Be Federally Regulated

The EPA wants to redefine ‘the waters of the United States’ to mean virtually any wet spot in the country.

Earlier this year the Environmental Protection Agency and Army Corps of Engineers proposed a rule redefining the “waters of the United States” that are subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act. The two agencies recently finished collecting public comments on their draft rule and are deciding how to proceed. Their best course is to abandon the rule or anything like it. Here’s why:

EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy wrote in Huffington Post in March that the draft rule would clarify the meaning of the relevant terms in the law without expanding federal jurisdiction and promised it would “save us time, keep money in our pockets, cut red tape, [and] give certainty to business.” None of this is true.

The Clean Water Act of 1972 prohibits discharges into “navigable waters” without a federal permit, defining “navigable waters” as “waters of the United States.” Initially the Army Corps and EPA interpreted waters of the U.S. to mean those that could be used as channels of navigation for interstate commerce. This reading is logical and necessary because the Clean Water Act is authorized by Congress’s power to regulate interstate commerce—which as Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), includes the transport of passengers and goods across state lines but not the commercial or noncommercial activity within a single state.

Within a few years, however, the two agencies claimed regulatory authority over wetlands and other nonnavigable waters that had no significant connection to interstate commerce. The Supreme Court has twice rejected these claims.

In SWANCC v. Army Corps of Engineers (2001), the court forbade the Army Corps from regulating “isolated water bodies” that were not connected to traditional navigable waters. Nevertheless, the Army Corps and EPA have largely ignored or circumvented the ruling with new interpretations. They claimed that they could regulate anything with a “hydrological connection” to traditional navigable waters—including normally dry-land features such as arroyos in the desert as well as ditches and culverts hundreds of miles from traditional navigable waters.

In Rapanos v. United States (2006), the Pacific Legal Foundation challenged the agencies’ jurisdictional reach again. A majority of the justices ruled that federal agencies could not regulate wetlands merely because they have a hydrological connection to downstream navigable waters.

Nevertheless, the agencies now seek to regulate isolated water bodies and any “other water” with a hydrological connection to traditional navigable waters—the very waters the Supreme Court said they could not regulate. The draft rule redefines “waters of the United States” so broadly that it covers virtually any wet—or occasionally wet—spot in the country, including ditches, drains, seasonal puddle-like depressions, intermittent streams, ponds, impoundments, prairie potholes, and large “buffer areas” of land adjacent to every waterway.

Specifically, the draft rule would allow for federal regulation of any pond, stream or ditch that has significant effects on downstream waters—and lets the agencies aggregate the effects of similar features across an entire “ecoregion,” covering thousands of square miles, such as the Central Great Plains. Certain ditches and artificial pools are excluded from federal control—but only if they are in dry, upland areas.

Federal bureaucrats already exercise considerable discretion. For example, according to a 2004 Government Accountability Office audit, federal officials in the same Army Corps office disagree on whether a particular water feature, occasional wet spot, or land adjoining a waterway is subject to regulation under the existing rules. The GAO concluded “the definitions used to make jurisdictional determinations” were “vague.” This situation fosters uncertainty and undermines economic activity and development.

The proposed rule magnifies the problem. It starts by including all tributaries in the nation (e.g., your backyard creek), and then authorizes federal officials to decide on a case-by-case basis if any “other waters” or land should be regulated. The proposed rule also asserts that federal jurisdiction is not limited to water contained in “aquatic systems” but covers the “associated chemical, physical, and biological features” of any aquatic system “as a whole.”

What isn’t a chemical, physical or biological feature of an aquatic system as a whole? Does that cover an entire ecoregion? Probably, since agency bureaucrats generally have discretion to interpret and apply their own definitions. Rather than clarify federal jurisdiction, as promised, the proposed rule introduces vastly greater uncertainty.

By any fair reading, the proposed rule would federalize virtually all water in the nation, and much of the land, in direct contravention of Supreme Court precedent and express congressional policy in the Clean Water Act “to recognize, preserve, and protect the primary responsibilities and rights of States to prevent, reduce, and eliminate pollution, to plan the development and use . . . of land and water resources.” It is patently unreasonable and should be amended or withdrawn.

If the rule is adopted in its present form, the Pacific Legal Foundation and others will again take these two agencies to court. But that takes time. Instead, Congress, the states, and the American people should prevail on the administration to follow the law.

<img src="http://www.miamiherald.com/incoming/s91naa/picture2951602/alternates/FREE_960/photo%20(31)%20(2).JPG" alt="Sediment carried into Lake Ingraham by canals dredged a century ago at Cape Sable are gradually filling the lake with acres of mud flats." width="800" height="" title="Sediment carried into Lake Ingraham by canals dredged a century ago at Cape Sable are gradually filling the lake with acres of mud flats." class="gallery-image">

<img src="http://www.miamiherald.com/incoming/lfg5ko/picture2951604/alternates/FREE_960/Aerial%20of%20East%20Cape%20Canal%20and%20East%20Side%20Creek%20looking%20NNE%20from%20near%20canal%20mo.jpg" alt="A dam constructed on the East Cape Canal in 2011 keeps sediments from widening the canal and moving deeper into the marsh. However the East Side Creek, to the right, continues to carry sediment from the bay inland." width="800" height="" title="A dam constructed on the East Cape Canal in 2011 keeps sediments from widening the canal and moving deeper into the marsh. However the East Side Creek, to the right, continues to carry sediment from the bay inland." class="gallery-image">

<img src="http://www.miamiherald.com/incoming/xxwn4s/picture2951606/alternates/FREE_960/20111219_123706_0330.jpg" alt="Rubble piles up as a swift current rushes past a failed dam on the Raulerson Canal and further erodes canal banks." width="800" height="" title="Rubble piles up as a swift current rushes past a failed dam on the Raulerson Canal and further erodes canal banks." class="gallery-image">

<img src="http://www.miamiherald.com/incoming/grumqf/picture2951607/alternates/FREE_960/Aerial%20of%20Raulerson%20Canal%20looking%20WSW%20from%20interior%20and%20showing%20turbidity%20pl.jpg" alt="From above and looking west, a plume of sediment fills the Raulerson Canal." width="800" height="" title="From above and looking west, a plume of sediment fills the Raulerson Canal." class="gallery-image">

<img src="http://www.miamiherald.com/incoming/jcx4k3/picture2951608/alternates/FREE_960/spoonbill0208%20flamingo(2)%20(2).JPG" alt="While fisherman stalk redfish in the background, a flock of flamingos crosses a shallow-water flat on Lake Ingraham in Everglades National Park in 2012." width="800" height="" title="While fisherman stalk redfish in the background, a flock of flamingos crosses a shallow-water flat on Lake Ingraham in Everglades National Park in 2012." class="gallery-image">

<img src="http://www.miamiherald.com/incoming/t5zoq/picture2951609/alternates/FREE_960/unnamed.jpg" alt="Flamingos take flight in Florida Bay." width="800" height="" title="Flamingos take flight in Florida Bay." class="gallery-image">

    

From the sky, Florida’s rugged tip looks like a scrap of emerald green lace: marshes and mangroves and tree islands all knit together by ribbons of creeks and lakes.

But at Cape Sable, a remote outpost where the Atlantic meets the Gulf of Mexico, the coast is fraying.

Usually, geological change is so slow that “you never see something in your lifetime,” Audubon Florida biologist Peter Frezza said recently as he piloted his boat around acres of mud flats filling Lake Ingraham. “But we’re watching this happen.”

For more than a decade, scientists have seen the cape as the tip of the sword in climate change. Sliced open by canals dug through the marl dividing marshes from the bay a century ago by Henry Flagler’s land company, the cape is particularly vulnerable to rising seas. Flagler was hoping to drain the wetland and lure homesteaders and ranchers.

No one ever came that far south — swarms of mosquitoes were said to suffocate cattle — but the canals widened. And as they expanded, the coast and marshes where crocodiles nest and migrating birds refuel for transcontinental flights started collapsing like a sandcastle pounded by waves.

Wildlife managers are now in a race. The more saltwater flows into marshes, the faster they die. And the faster marshes die, the more damaging nutrients from the dead sedge and other vegetation wash into the bay.

Scientists think they have a fix. Simply plug the canals. But getting money to repair a problem accessible only by boat — and easily lost in the long list of Everglades restoration projects — has been tough. Three years ago Everglades National Park constructed $7 million dams to plug the two most damaging canals using federal stimulus grants. Now, tired of waiting for work to continue, the nonprofit Everglades Foundation has supplied $143,000 to the park service, half the cost of completing an environmental assessment needed before more money — an estimated $10 million — can be sought to plug four smaller canals.

“With the canals plugged, we may not be able to stop” the damage, said acting park superintendent Bob Krumenaker. “But we can slow down the action and make the system more resilient for a considerably longer time.”

As early as the 1950s, wildlife managers spotted trouble at the two main canals, the East Cape and Homestead. Originally dug only 15 to 20 feet wide, the canals broadened to 10 times their width with the constant scouring by tides. Workers erected earthen dams to stop the canals from widening. But hurricanes and erosion washed away the dams. About 2005, damage started increasing exponentially, Frezza said.

“Even in the last three years the rate water is moving in and out is truly astonishing,” said Carol Mitchell, deputy science director at Everglades and Dry Tortugas National Parks.

At the Raulerson Brothers Canal at the western tip of Lake Ingraham, water rushes down the canal at low tide in white-capped rapids. One morning last month, Tom Van Lent, the director of science and policy at the Everglades Foundation, pointed to three feet of exposed grass and mangrove roots, a sign of just how quickly the marsh has shrunk “like letting air out of a mattress.” A side creek that Van Lent said was impassable five years ago sends water gushing out.

Scientists fear that all the nutrients washing out of the dying marsh could profoundly damage the bay. In 1992, when a massive algae bloom turned much of Florida Bay into a smelly, slimy dead zone, scientists believe the trigger was nutrient run-off. In recent years, the amount of algae-feeding nutrients in Lake Ingraham has remained much higher than in the Everglades to the north.

“We’ll never know what triggers an algae bloom,” Van Lent said. “But adding nutrients to Florida Bay is not a good thing.”

On the flip side, sediment carried by incoming tides over the last 30 years has dramatically changed Lake Ingraham. Once a freshwater lake, it is now salty and filled with acres of barren mud flats. Audubon’s Frezza said the food chain has shrunk, with small fish declining and larger fish and seabirds going elsewhere to hunt.

“It’s not quite the dead sea, but it’s pretty bad,” Van Lent said.

Park officials hope to complete the environmental assessment within the next 18 months, Krumenaker said. The assessment will look at whether plugging the four remaining canals — the Raulerson, East Side Creek, Slagle’s Ditch and House Ditch — can slow the process and improve water quality. Once the assessment is complete, the park hopes to begin the arduous process of finding money, teaming up with nonprofits to go after grants.

“We’ll talk to anyone who’s interested in this project and has a checkbook,” Krumenaker said.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/environment/article2951611.html#storylink=cpy

"South Florida at forefront of climate planning, top U.S. scientist says " @miamiherald by Jenny Staletovich

A week before a seasonal high tide is expected to soak Miami Beach, the White House’s chief science adviser visited the city Wednesday to praise regional leaders for their work on climate change.

“What’s going on... here is really a model for what we need to see going on around the country,” John Holdren told an audience of about 650 at the Sixth Annual Southeast Florida Climate Leadership Summit at the Miami Beach Convention Center.

Holdren, who last month landed on The Daily Show after skirmishing with the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology over polar ice melt, got a decidedly warmer welcome at the gathering that drew a wide audience from government, private industry and nonprofits.

The summit, part of a compact forged four years ago among South Florida’s four counties, serves as annual wrap-up and rallying cry for addressing threats from climate change. The two-day event features about a dozen panels on public policy and and planning.

In his address, Holdren ran down a laundry list of climate-related risks from rising temperatures to worsening storms. Sitting just feet above sea level, South Florida is particularly vulnerable to both flooding and saltwater tainting water supplies.

Because porous limestone lies under Florida, controlling water can be tricky, Tommy Strowd, director of operations for the Lake Worth Drainage District and a former deputy director at the South Florida Water Management District, told the group. The system of canals and flood control structures built a half century ago to drain the Everglades that covered much of South Florida only made matters worse.

To address threats, the White House has taken a number of steps, from setting carbon limits on power plants to committing $1 billion to Everglades restoration, said policy adviser Mike Boots, who chairs the White House Council on Environmental Quality. In March, the administration also released federal data hoping to encourage scientists and private industry to come up with solutions.

“We do not have the luxury of time on this issue, so we need you... to keep acting boldly,” he told the group.

Holdren said afterward he considers South Florida a leader on the issue because it is one of the few regions that has formed a compact.

For the past three decades, University of Miami geology professor Harold Wanless has tracked the tides as they crept higher, watched oysters head for drier ground and repeatedly warned that the ocean is swelling in ways that could one day put coastal cities like Miami under water.

His predictions — punctuated with dire conclusions like “this is going to test the very fibers of civilization” — often drew skepticism or, worse, silence.

But earlier this month, two new studies reported findings that, if they hold up, would confirm what he and other scientists have long suspected: Global warming has triggered an unstoppable melting of polar ice in Antarctica that could raise sea level by 10 feet or more over the next several centuries.

Coming on the heels of international and national assessments that this spring affirmed the effects of climate change, the 72-year-old professor is finding himself in new territory.

“People used to yell at you when you gave talks,” said Wanless, who is not prone to smiling. “They don’t do that anymore.”

The chair of UM’s geology department, he has a 43-page résumé listing dozens of publications and accomplishments, including being a lecturer for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration as well as an elementary school science fair judge. He now hopes the long debate over climate change can get to what he sees as the real point: not whether humans are warming the planet, but how fast it is warming.

Alarming signs

Wanless was not alone when he sounded the alarm bell on rising seas over the years. But getting the public — and politicians — to pay attention was a struggle, particularly for scientists used to operating in the safety of their laboratories.

“You’re supposed to be sitting in a lab doing really good science, and what’s happening to the rest of the world is not of your concern,” said Orrin Pilkey, a Duke University earth and ocean sciences professor emeritus and expert in coastal erosion.

Then came findings that man-made greenhouse gases were changing the planet’s climate in dangerous ways. Around the world, from growing acidity in warmer oceans to rising water in South Florida, alarming signs began forcing scientists into the public debate, sometimes at their own risk. Michael Mann, a Pennsylvania State University climatologist and geophysicist whose work helped the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) win the Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore in 2007, had his emails hacked and his records subpoenaed by Virginia’s attorney general and wound up in a bitter libel dispute with the National Review.

When it came to sea level rise, Wanless was often at the front of that effort in South Florida, Pilkey said.

“The good thing about Hal is he’s greatly respected by the scientific community,” he said. “I think we’re lucky to have him on patrol.”

But his predictions that put sea level rises in South Florida higher than consensus assessments sometimes triggered skepticism. In its April report, the IPCC predicted a one-to-three-foot rise over the next century. The Miami-Dade County Climate Change Task Force that Wanless co-chairs predicted a three-to-five-foot rise. But Wanless believes the starting point for projections should be four feet.

“It doesn’t mean we are saying different things about the science,” said Leonard Berry, director of the Florida Center for Environmental Studies at Florida Atlantic University and an author of the National Climate Assessment’s Southeast chapter, published in April. “It means we are making different judgments about the timing of those events. In defense of Hal’s position, every step of the way in the last 10 or 15 years, our projections have moved upwards. So some of the rest of us are where he was 10 years ago.”

Still, Benjamin Kirtman, a UM meteorology and oceanography professor who helped author the April IPCC report, said more studies need to be done to confirm the higher projections for sea rise triggered by melting ice.

Wanless has not ducked the contentious politics of the issue and does not hesitate to call out skeptics of manmade climate change, particularly politicians. He said he twice offered to convene scientists to talk to U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio, but the Miami Republican never took him up on the offers. So when Rubio recently said on ABC News that he was not convinced humans were driving climate change, Wanless called it “horrible.”

Though Rubio later said in an interview with the Miami Herald that he is not denying that climate change is occurring, he also would not answer yes or no when asked whether humans were driving the change.

“I understand, politically, the issue is easier to write as ‘He either supports it or he doesn’t. He either believes it or he doesn’t.’ But these are complex issues. Even the science on this has evolved over the past 20 years,” Rubio said.

Wanless, however, is unequivocal in his response.

“Any elected official who doesn’t understand climate change, who isn’t fully trying to plan for what people and communities are going to have to face,” he said, “shouldn’t be in elected office.”

For Wanless, taking up climate change was a matter of joining the family business. His father, Harold Wanless Sr., was a geologist at the University of Illinois who helped crack the riddle of advancing and retreating glaciers as early as 1936. His posthumously published book, Our Changing Shorelines, became a definitive study of the evolution of shorelines, said Pilkey, who keeps a copy in his office.

After graduating from Princeton, completing graduate work at the University of Miami and earning a doctorate at Johns Hopkins University, the younger Wanless picked up where his father left off, examining ancient formations from the Grand Canyon to the mud banks in Florida Bay. His work took him from the tangled mangroves of Florida Bay to the frigid base of a glacier.

Artic researcher

“He’s one of the unusual scientists that has worked both ends of the problem,” Berry said. “He’s worked in the Arctic and really has as good a sense as anybody on the dynamics of the Arctic, but he also lives and works in Florida, where you have the impacts of the Arctic.”

Wanless sees his work as connecting the dots, recorded in carbon dating, that show how the seas rose in bursts as ice sheets disintegrated.

“That turns out to be the only thing we know about how fast ice can respond to climate change,” he said.

One day last week, sitting in his office at the end of a maze of hallways on the bottom floor of UM’s Cox Science Building, Wanless traced his conclusions on climate change to three turning points in the past three decades.

First came a 1980s workshop where a scientist with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution presented a paper on rising sea level and tidal gauges. Wanless said he came home, recruited a grad student and starting reviewing decades of recordings from tidal gauges. He even found indications of sea rise in his own neighborhood: Oysters attached to pilings on the Le Jeune Road bridge over the Gables Waterway had moved six inches higher since the 1940s.

Then in the 1990s, Mann, the Nobel Prize-winning climatologist. completed climate modeling that he said showed greenhouse gases were driving global warming. The final piece of the puzzle came when scientists found the warming was expanding the planet’s oceans, making low-lying Florida, the porous ridge of a larger limestone plateau fingering into the Caribbean, particularly vulnerable.

“Then my talks on sea level rise could suddenly say global warming is real and the warming of our oceans was a good part of sea level rise,” Wanless said.

Though some skeptics have argued that the planet has stopped warming because temperatures have stopped rising during the past 15 years, he says that’s “hooey.”

Greenhouse gases trap heat from the sun. That “back radiation” then gets absorbed by the oceans, which cover about 70 percent of the planet.

“That’s the way it’s always worked. Water has the great capacity to hold heat. It always has. It’s wonderful,” he said.

In the summers of 2012 and 2013, Wanless headed to western Greenland to see for himself what was happening with the planet’s massive ice sheets. He camped at the bottom of the Jacobshavn glacier, which scientists have been closely watching for signs of collapse. When he flew over in 2012, he said, 97 percent of the ice sheet was glistening as it melted. It is also releasing huge amounts of methane from organic material trapped in the ice, one of the chemicals in the greenhouse gas cocktail that could cause even greater warming.

“In 2002, [scientists] thought the Arctic might be ice-free by 2070,” he said. “Now they realize it will be ice-free this decade.”

In its report last week, the NASA-funded University of California at Irvine study found warmer ocean water was flowing under the edges of the vast West Antarctic ice sheet, destabilizing it. On his visits to Greenland, which began losing ice mass in the 1970s, Wanless said he could see fractures not just around the sheet’s edges, but miles inland.

It looked, he said, like “a meandering river valley for 50 miles because the warm water had gotten in.”

Sending message

The title of Wanless’ first editorial about sea rise in the 1980s started as a joke — “Sea Level Rise. So What?” — but over the years, it became a call to action.

“Hal has really taken his science directly to the people,” said UM’s Kirtman. “The science is driving him to this social consciousness.”

Wanless’s higher projections for sea rise included a longer timeframe than what policy makers felt comfortable managing, said James F. Murley, the South Florida Regional Planning Council’s executive director, who helped author the National Climate Assessment. Policymakers deal in decades, not centuries, he said.

“They have different views or disciplines that they use to reach their conclusions,” he said. “Hal is really focused on [long-range projections] and that’s harder for people to grasp, the idea that the water is going to rise at whatever level of time and rise and rise and not recede.”

And for solutions to be realistic, Kirtman said, projections have to be manageable. “Hal’s arguing what’s going to happen in the next 100 years and what I like to argue about is the next 10 years,” he said.

But Wanless contends that softening predictions is irresponsible. In typical fashion, his warning comes in stark terms.

That postponement threatens to torpedo efforts to convince Congress to split the $2 billion cost with the state to help restore lake water flows to the Everglades – cut off by decades of drainage to make way for South Florida development and farming.

Sending more lake water south could boost South Florida drinking water supplies in addition to helping Everglades wildlife habitat. It could also lessen the draining of Lake Okeechobee water out to sea for flood control, which hurts coastal fishing grounds.

Gov. Rick Scott Wednesday issued a statement saying he was "extremely disappointed" in the delay and called for the board of top Army Corps' officials to immediately reconvene to reconsider the Central Everglades plan.

"We must do everything it takes to protect the natural treasures that Florida families rely on," Scott said.

The Everglades Foundation environmental group called the delay "a staggering failure of duty and responsibility" that threatens to set back the Central Everglades plan for years.

"The blame for this failure – and future damage to the environment and economy – now is squarely on the epaulets of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers," Everglades Foundation CEO Eric Eikenberg said.

Army Corps officials on Wednesday countered that they remain committed to the Central Everglades plan, nearly three years in the making. They said concerns about water quality issues in the Everglades need to be addressed with the state before they can give the OK to move the proposal on to Congress.

Army Corps officials say they plan to renew talks with the South Florida Water Management District to overcome the water quality hurdle and then try to sign off on the plan by the end of June.

But they also said that getting it done in time to be included in this year's water bill isn't their primary concern.

"We understand everybody's frustration," said Eric Bush, the Army Corps policy chief overseeing the crafting of the Central Everglades plan. "We haven't failed. We are very close."

The end of June could be too late, according to environmental advocates.

Florida officials are trying to get the Central Everglades project added to a list of water projects that Congress is considering this year.

Not getting that Congressional approval for the Central Everglades project this year could translate to even more years of waiting for construction that was already projected to be a decade away. About seven years passed between the previous water project bills approved by Congress.

"We just can't continue to keep the Everglades parched," said Eric Draper, Audubon Florida's executive director. "We are losing habitat every day."

Tuesday's delay out of Washington D.C. comes less than two weeks after the South Florida Water Management District endorsed the Everglades restoration plan, agreeing to potentially pay half of the nearly $2 billion cost.

The Central Everglades plan involves removing portions of levees, filling in canals and increasing pumping to redirect more Lake Okeechobee water flows toward Everglades National Park.

Moving more Lake Okeechobee water south, where it once naturally flowed, would lessen the amount of lake water that gets drained out to sea through the Caloosahatchee and St. Lucie rivers – with damaging water quality consequences along the coast.

Last summer, draining hundreds of billions of gallons of fresh water from the lake into the normally salty estuaries killed sea grass and oyster beds and scared off fish. The influx of pollutants and sediment from the lake draining also hurt water quality, fueling toxic algae blooms that made some coastal waterways unsafe for swimming.

"This (delay) could really signify a missed opportunity and lead to more suffering for ecosystems, estuary communities and local economies," said Caroline McLaughlin, of the National Parks Conservation Association.

Earlier this month, the projected cost of the Central Everglades project was bumped up about $100 million to $1.9 billion.

Florida taxpayers have already spent about $2 billion on Everglades restoration. On top of that, the Florida Legislature last year approved an $880 million ongoing plan to clean up Everglades water pollution.

The water quality concern federal officials cited Wednesday stems from the possibility that increasing the amount of water flowing to the Everglades could also bring an influx of pollutants that makes it harder for the state to meet federal water quality standards.

State officials have sought assurances that they won't ended up getting penalized for moving much-needed water south to the Everglades, but the Army Corps contends it won't roll back water quality standards.

abreid@tribune.com, 561-228-5504 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 561-228-5504 FREE  end_of_the_skype_highlighting or Twitter@abreidnews

George Lindemann, George-Lindemann, George Lindemann Jr, George-Lindemann-Jr, Lindemann, Lindemann George, Lindemann George Jr, George Lindemann Junior, Jr George Lindemann, Lindemann Jr George, George L Lindemann, https://www.facebook.com/pages/George-Lindemann/284564361662689, https://www.facebook.com/pages/George-Lindemann-Jr/284564361662689, , www.forbes.com/profile/george-lindemann, www.nova.edu/alumni/profiles/george_lindemann.html, http://www.therichest.com/celebnetworth/celebrity-business/investors/george-lindemann-net-worth, www.linkedin.com/pub/george-lindemann/b/945/78a, www.linkedin.com/pub/george-lindemann-jr/b/945/78a, www.georgelindemann.com, www.georgelindemann.posthaven.com,

Overdue answers for how to fix more of Lake Okeechobee's troubled dike may come this summer, but the start of that repair work could still be almost three years away, according to federal officials.

The 70-year-old dike that protects South Florida communities and farmland from flooding is considered one of the country's most at-risk of failing. Despite the concerns, repairs have been slowed through the years by technical problems, escalating costs and other setbacks.

George Lindemann, George-Lindemann, George Lindemann Jr, George-Lindemann-Jr, Lindemann, Lindemann George, Lindemann George Jr, George Lindemann Junior, Jr George Lindemann, Lindemann Jr George, George L Lindemann, https://www.facebook.com/pages/George-Lindemann/284564361662689, https://www.facebook.com/pages/George-Lindemann-Jr/284564361662689,

George Lindemann is an American businessman and the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Southern Union, a pipeline company.^{[2][3][4][5][6]} He also owns 19 Spanish-language radio stations.^[4][6]

George Lindemann Journal by George Lindemann

George Lindemann Journal

George Lindemann Journal - "MOCA mum on move rumors" @miamiherald By Hannah Sampson and Jordan Levin

Is the Museum of Contemporary Art, North Miami preparing to shed the “North Miami” from its name?

The Art Newspaper reported Thursday that the museum might be moving, and cited unnamed sources who said MOCA could potentially merge with the Bass Museum of Art in Miami Beach.

Thursday afternoon, MOCA interim director Alex Gartenfeld would only say that the board is “thinking very deeply about what the future of MOCA might hold.” But he said such conversations have been going on for years and there was no new urgency to those talks.

“There have been longstanding discussions and rumors about the relationship between our institutional mission and our location,” he said.

Rumors of a potential move, however vague, angered one prominent Miami collector who has donated several works to MOCA.

Rosa de la Cruz said she and husband Carlos were upset because in her mind, moving the museum would be akin to closing it — and merging with another museum would be the same as giving the collection away.

“I gave work to that museum,” de la Cruz said. “I didn’t give works to the Bass Museum.”

Although de la Cruz would not say where she heard the rumor, she said she was disappointed that no one from the board reached out to her directly.

“I think the collectors and the people that gave and the artists that gave work to that museum should have at least been informed and asked for advice,” she said. “It would have been a little more elegant, I think.”

Co-chairs of the museum’s board of trustees, Irma Braman and Ray Ellen Yarkin, declined to comment.

The rumors follow a period of change for the institution, which is partially funded by North Miami. Longtime director and chief curator Bonnie Clearwater announced her departure in July to take the same position at Nova Southeastern University’s Museum of Art in Fort Lauderdale.

A year earlier, the museum suffered a blow to its plans for an expansion that would have tripled its space when voters in North Miami rejected a $15 million city bond issue to fund the project.

When Clearwater announced that she was leaving, she said the city and board were looking at all options and “being very creative.”

“The museum’s reputation is really not tied to the building,” she said at the time. “It’s where we built our reputation.”

Gartenfeld pointed to that comment in an interview Thursday. He said a robust exhibition program has already been announced through early 2015, and daily educational activities and regular public programs are continuing.

“The worry that MOCA will go away, that’s not something that’s going to happen,” he said.

The Art Newspaper’s story took city officials in North Miami by surprise.

“I cannot answer to rumors that they are leaving because I have not been formally informed,” Mayor Lucie Tondreau said Thursday.

Although city manager Stephen Johnson was slated to meet Friday with the museum’s board, that meeting was scheduled several weeks ago to discuss the appointment of a permanent executive director, city spokeswoman Pam Solomon said.

Tucked between city hall and the police department, MOCA is the centerpiece of downtown North Miami and the city’s emphasis on arts and culture; it had been allocated $982,000 in the city’s 2014 preliminary budget.

“Absolutely MOCA is an important part of our arts and culture,” said Solomon.

At the Bass Museum of Art, executive director Silvia Karman Cubiñá was not available to comment.

In an emailed statement, the president of the board of directors, George Lindemann, said in part: “The Bass Museum welcomes collaborations with institutions in Miami and from around the world....We are continually evaluating opportunities for these collaborations so as to strengthen our programming and widen our audiences.”

Reached by phone, he declined to talk about any arrangement with MOCA.

Gartenfeld also avoided specifics, saying: “I can’t comment on probabilities and things like that. It’s too much speculation.”

He said the museum already collaborates with other institutions in South Florida, highlighting the recently formed Miami Art Museums Alliance.