On the heels of Miami-Dade Mayor Carlos Gimenez’s declaration last week that he will push to strengthen the urban development boundary, a countermove has sprung up in the Florida Legislature that would weaken the county’s protection against urban sprawl on its western and southern fringes.
State Sen. Ellyn Bodganoff, a Fort Lauderdale Republican, put forth an amendment to a House bill on Friday that would make it easier to shift the UDB by requiring a simple majority of the commission to approve any change to the county’s comprehensive plan, which guides development.
But Gimenez protested, calling the move an attempt to undermine the county’s unique local powers.
On Tuesday, at his first state-of-the-county address, the mayor said he would work to bolster the UDB by pushing to incorporate into the county charter a requirement that an extraordinary supermajority — three-fourths, or 10 of 13 commissioners — sign off on any changes to the invisible boundary that limits development bordering the Everglades.
The county currently requires a two-thirds majority — nine of 13 commissioners — to approve any change to the UDB.
Gimenez sent a letter Friday to each member of the Miami-Dade legislative delegation — along with Senate President Mike Haridopolos, R-Merritt Island, and House Speaker Dean Cannon, R-Winter Park — blasting the legislative move as an interference with Miami-Dade’s Home Rule Charter. He said it “potentially threatens precious wetlands.”
“They are trying to usurp local authority,” the mayor told The Miami Herald. “It strikes me as funny that soon as my state-of-the-county address calls for strengthening the UDB, this crops up.”
(An incarnation of the amendment surfaced Monday, a day before Gimenez’s speech.)
In the letter, the mayor said denying Miami-Dade residents the ability to require a supermajority vote to amend the UDB would be “denying the people of Miami-Dade County the ability to govern themselves on this issue of local concern.”
EMAILS CIRCULATE
Local environmentalists circulated emails over the weekend urging supporters to call Bogdanoff to oppose her amendment.
The most recent effort to move the UDB came two months ago. Miami-Dade commissioners, acting against the recommendation of county planners, sent the state an application by Ferro Investment Group II to allow business and office development on 9.9 acres designated as agricultural on the southeast corner of Southwest 167th Avenue and 104th Street, outside the UDB.
Ferro Investment’s pro-bono lobbyist is lawyer Miguel Diaz de la Portilla, also a Republican state senator from Miami. Diaz de la Portilla, a former county commissioner, said the project has no relation to Bogdanoff’s amendment.
“Absolutely not,” he said. “The Ferro application has nothing to do with that.”
Diaz de la Portilla noted he helped create Miami-Dade’s community councils to give neighbors a say on proposed development. He also backed requiring that a two-thirds majority of commissioners approve UDB-related applications if they burdened public services. That condition has since been eliminated, he said, adding that he favors Bogdanoff’s amendment to even the playing field for property owners.
via miamiherald.com